Please make sure not to 'steal' EWoT's work; this page was substantially identical in format and content to their page. I know we have a limited amount of information about 'bit characters' like this, but it needs to be our words, not theirs, as they don't share the same copyleft license as the rest of Wikia/Wikipedia. -- nae'blis 21:57, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
I've remade it, in different enough phrasing to satisfy copyright requirements. I'm not the one who made the original page, but I feel I should point out that you could have reworded it yourself, rather than deleting the whole page. Puragus Talk 05:45, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
- Leaving the old text in the history leaves it available for other wikis to utilize, actually, so I couldn't. The proper response to any copyright violations is to delete them from the record (if it's just a section, that edit can usually be undone), then recreate from scratch. See Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations for the guideline I am using here; since it was the original edit, there was nothing to revert to, and it would have looked like we were using EWoT's text as our basis for the rewording. -- nae'blis 17:18, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
I see. I'm sorry I was so sharp there, I didn't know that rule. I was just going by my own experience on other wikis, and I've never had a problem with in-text copyright violations, so I thought the only rule would be the usual one: "If there's a problem with the text, just rewrite it." I didn't realize you had to delete the whole history if there was a copyright problem. My mistake, sorry. Puragus Talk 23:17, October 24, 2009 (UTC)