This article is rubbish. Named from the first person who learned to channel? Due to the nature of time in the series, there is no first channeler. This, to me, seems like speculation, and nothing more. Ablar 10:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- It's from the glossary of one of the books. It is stated in the glossary that this is only speculation or legend about it, but that's where it comes from. [1]141.214.17.5 19:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- It might need to be edited, but to call it rubbish is absurd, the refences are correct. How can it be rubbish if it's canon? What's rubbish is when people who don't know what they are talking about assume they do, and then ruin articles. Kpugs 06:27, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
- This comment was from 2 years ago, I doubt he's still around. So calm down and carry on ;) — fbstj 08:41, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
- It might need to be edited, but to call it rubbish is absurd, the refences are correct. How can it be rubbish if it's canon? What's rubbish is when people who don't know what they are talking about assume they do, and then ruin articles. Kpugs 06:27, November 22, 2010 (UTC)